Mr. Lorry and
Mss. Pross kept the news of Doctor Manette’s relapse a secret from Luci. They
did this in a sly way; “Miss Pross was to write, describing his (Doctor
Manette) having been called away professionally, and referring to an imaginary
letter of two or three hurried lines in his own hand, represented to have been
addressed to her by the same post” (207). Should Miss. Pross and Mr. Lorry have done this? Did they have the right too? I do not think they had the right to conceal
this information from Luci. Luci
had been through so much with her father and had brought him mentally so far
that she deserved to know his condition, she deserved to know his mental state
especially if she played a role in it.
If Luci had been informed about her Father she may have been able to
bring him back by walking up and down the hall with him like she frequently did,
or just by her presence. But instead with out Luci’s assistance Doctor Manette
reverted to the pointless activity or shoemaking for nine days, which is
clearly unhealthy and unproductive.
Miss. Pross and Mr. Lorry ended up destroying Doctor Manette's shoe
making tools using a chopper, saw, chisel, and hammer. They did this only for the wellbeing of
Doctor Manette. But in the long
run was this the best thing to do?
Once again I think they made the wrong decision. We can infer that if Doctor Manette
relapses again Mr. Lorry and Mss. Pross will once again keep it a secret from
Luci, because they don’t want upset or disappoint her. Their devotion, admiration and love to
her is so strong “Mr. Lorry, who could not sufficiently admire the bride, and
who had been moving round her to take in every point of her quiet, pretty
dress; “and so it was for this, my sweet Lucie, that I brought you across the
Channel, such a baby! Lord bless me!” (199). In this case Mr. Manette will be without his two essentials
to cope with; his beloved daughter and is shoemaking kit. From this we might infer that he will
find a new coping skill but Dickens suggests something else.
Dickens left us with thick foreshadowing
at the end of chapter 19; “while engaged in the commission of their deed and in
the removal of its traces, almost felt, and almost looked, like accomplices in
a horrible crime” (214). Dickens
doesn’t add this passage in for no reason I think he is giving us insight on
what is too come. I predict that "innocent" Mr. Lorry and Miss. Pross are indeed taking away Doctor Manette's life
by destroying his cope. The metaphor Dickens is using is physical death, one
might infer that it is being compared to the shoemaking tools, but in reality I
believe its being compared to the mental death of Doctor Manette.
I think Alana does a great job pointing out a possible foreshadowing from Dickens. Sometimes they are tough to catch, but we have already seen a couple of them come true ( the Death of Monsieur the Marquis, spilling of the blood on the streets ). I also noticed a possible foreshadowing on pg. 218 about Lucy. "Among the echoes then, there would arise the sound of footsteps at her own early grave"(218). We don't know for sure, but Dickens could be foreshadowing the death of Lucy Manette. We will just have to keep reading and find out!
ReplyDeleteI thought Alana did a really nice job with the passages she chose. However, (in the most respective way possible), I think that Miss Pross and Mr. Lorry in some ways did the right thing by keeping the relapse a secret from Lucy. I don't think we can infer that Dr. Manette will have another relapse, although it is possible. If Dr. Manette doesn't remember the relapse anyway then it shouldn't really be an issue. I think part of the reason he had the relapse was because Lucy went away. If they told Lucy that his relapse happened, she would have taken the blame and guilt heavily on herself and wouldn't trust herself to leave him ever again. This would affect Lucy's happiness which is exactly what Dr. Manette doesn't want. He says that he loves that she cares for him but doesn't want her to waste her life on him and wants her to seek her own happiness.
ReplyDeleteNice job, Alana -- I particularly like your comments near the end on what this foreshadows. It's interesting that Dickens uses language pertaining to "crimes" to describe this scene.
ReplyDelete