Throughout the discussions of book 3 a recurring
question has been; "Why would the Defarges want to imprison Darnay after
they had scene the suffering Doctor Manette had to endure"? This is
a fair question to the reader of the first half of book 3. It makes since
that the Defarges would not want anyone else to have to go through the same
pain that they watched Doctor Manette go through, but after advancing in book 3 one understands the Defarges point of view. And one could even argue
"Why wouldn’t the Defarges want to imprison Darnay after they had scene
the suffering Doctor Manette had to endure". This may seem harsh or
upfront but the reality is that Dannay’s family had directly caused Doctor
Manettes imprisonment; "I decided, that day, to write privately
to the Minister, stating the nature of the two cases to which I had been
summoned, and the place to which I had gone: in effect, stating all the
circumstances. I knew what Court influence was, and what the immunities of the
Nobles were, and I expected that the matter would never be heard of; but, I
wished to relieve my own mind. I had kept the matter a profound secret, even
from my wife; and this; too, I resolved to state in my letter. I had no
apprehension whatever of my real danger; but I was conscious that there might
be danger for others, if others were compromised by possessing the knowledge
that I possessed" (335). Doctor Manette was innocently tying to get
the baffling experience off of his chest; little did he know it was leading to
the end of his life as he once knew it. The Brothers who Doctor Manette
had been working for somehow got a hold of this letter and were deeply angered.
These brothers are special because they are relatives of Darnay! This
letter had such an impact on the brothers because it made their family look
bad. the way the brothers acted upon the letter was sever and mercy less;
"It brought me here, it brought me to my grave. When I was clear of the
house, a black muffler was drawn tightly over my mouth from behind, and my arms
were pinioned. The two brothers crossed the road from a dark corner, and
identified me with a single gesture. The Marquis took from his pocket the
letter I had written, showed it me, burnt it in the light of a lantern that was
held, and extinguished the ashes with his foot. Not a word was spoken. I was
brought here, I was brought to my living grave" (338). These
brothers did this to protect their family name, and also to exercise their
power. As Dickens says; "The two brothers crossed the road from a
dark corner, and identified me with a single gesture", these brothers seem
casual and calm about the situation clearly with out any sympathy for Doctor Manette's
life.
Its interesting how Dickens writes in a way that makes us
quickly shift our own opinion on people due to Dickens words. Up until
now we have had more sympathy and respect for Darnay, and less for Carton. We
recently were against the Defarges due to their strict and unsympathetic
ruling. But this section has shifted all of our opinions. Now the
reader understand where the Defarnges stern rule is rooting from, and now the
reader sides with them. We also no longer think of Darnay as a
respectable man because we know what his family is capable of. And what
they have done to Doctor Manette who is a character that Dickens has had us
siding with from day one. It is interesting how Dickens influences the
reader so greatly and has such a way with pulling everything together.
I totally agree with what you're saying, Alana, about how easily Dickens can alter the readers own opinions on specific characters just by how he describes them. I wrote on something similar, my opinion of Madame Defarge in chapter 12 was able to change so quickly just by Dickens describing the real reason she doesn't like the Darnay family. Dickens is able to have a strong influence on the reader and how they think.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I also agree with how Dickens shifts the readers opinion so quickly. Although I wouldn't say that I side with the Defarges. I would agree that it makes them more understandable though. Also, I like how you connected that just the association of Darnay to the brothers and the crime they commited was his death sentence.
ReplyDeleteAlana, this is how i felt when I read Dr. Manette revealing letter. At first, i thought Darnay was a good guy and didn't deserve to die due to his family, but after finishing the chapter, i was outraged with his family. I couldn't believe how awful they treated the peasants and the women and thought that he did deserve to die. Although it wasn't his actions, it still made readers angry and want any person related to such a villian to feel the pain that these peasants felt. Its funny how Dickens is able to do this in one chapter. He made readers hate Darnay and love Carton.
ReplyDelete-Marci
Terrific textual support in this post, Alana, but do you really believe that we should be in favor of the Defarges? When you write, "Now the reader understand where the Defarnges stern rule is rooting from, and now the reader sides with them. We also no longer think of Darnay as a respectable man because we know what his family is capable of." I agree with your comments on the Defarges being more "understandable," but should we no longer respect Darnay? What did he do that was wrong? If his family does something bad, does that mean that he did something bad?
ReplyDelete